C-SPAN has had historians rank all the Presidents. Most interesting to me is their comparison of the last time they did this back in 2000. Bill Clinton has certainly gone up (or down if you want to be technical) in rank. Now he is no.15. Not bad and I'm not posting this to start a debate. It's interesting to me that he has done so much better in 2009 than in 2000. Do the years afford more objectivity, or is this simply a comparison to Bush (no. 36)? I think its a little of both.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment